Control body, representative of regions, or elitist chamber of wisdom? The perceived roles of upper chambers and the case of the Czech Senate

Logo poskytovatele

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Ekonomicko-správní fakultu, ale pod Fakultu sociálních studií. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.
Autoři

HRUŠKA Jan BALÍK Stanislav

Rok publikování 2024
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj Journal of Legislative Studies
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Fakulta sociálních studií

Citace
www article - open access
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2024.2355729
Klíčová slova Bicameralism; elitism; legitimacy; perceptions; second/upper chambers; the Czech Senate
Popis Existing research on bicameralism has paid rather limited attention to examining the legitimacy of upper chambers. This paper addresses this research gap and examines the unintended roles of upper chambers using the case of the Czech Senate. It explains how citizens perceive the role of the upper chamber and how their perceptions can differ from the chamber’s actual role. The research employs content analysis of semi-structured interviews with two groups of citizens (30 in total). The results show that the Senate is perceived as an elitist, apolitical institution that is or should be composed of wise, experienced, and moral people. A minority of citizens perceive the Senate as a body representative of local interests. However, these perceptions do not correspond to reality. The difference between the Senate’s perceived and real role can have both negative and positive effects on the institution’s legitimacy.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.