Should the discussion on whether non-state law might be elected as the governing law of contract be silenced forever?

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Ekonomicko-správní fakultu, ale pod Právnickou fakultu. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.
Autoři

GRODL Lukáš

Rok publikování 2019
Druh Článek ve sborníku
Konference Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21st Century
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Právnická fakulta

Citace
www Open access sborníku
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9497-2019-4
Klíčová slova Non-state Law; Lex Mercatoria; Rome I Regulation; Hague Principles; Globalization; Dichotomy; Model Law; Doctrine
Popis While the extent of the choice of law governing the cross-border contract is subjected to positive law, in the European Union being the Rome I Regulation, some always argued for expanded party autonomy regarding the non-state law. The European Commission proposed the incorporation of such in Rome I Regulation, but it has been ultimately rejected. This article considers the European development, debates whether discussion on non-state law being allowed as the governing law to a cross-border contract is still vital and provides an answer whether discussion on such should be ended or not.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.