European “Judicial Monologue” of the Czech Constitutional Court – a Critical Review of its approach to the Preliminary Ruling Procedure

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Ekonomicko-správní fakultu, ale pod Právnickou fakultu. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.

Autoři	SEHNÁLEK David STEHLÍK Václav
Rok publikování	2019
Druh	Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj	International and Comparative Law Review
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU	Právnická fakulta
Citace
www	Open access časopisu
Doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0020
Klíčová slova	Czech courts; Czech Constitutional Court; Court of Justice of the European Union; preliminary ruling procedure; judicial dialog; European constitutionalism.
Přiložené soubory	iclr-2019-0020.pdf
Popis	The paper analyses the use of the preliminary ruling procedure by the Czech Constitutional Court and the attitude of this court towards the EU law. The approach of the Constitutional Court to the judicial dialog is also compared with some other European constitutional courts mainly with those who have a similar role in national judiciary or with those who were able to effectively take an advantage of the preliminary ruling procedure. The paper demonstrates that the Czech Constitutional Court took the position that seems to be unsustainable from a long time perspective as the reality of the current development favours the spirit of cooperation among European highest courts.