The effect of river restoration on fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes: A meta-analysis
| Autoři | |
|---|---|
| Rok publikování | 2015 |
| Druh | Článek v odborném periodiku |
| Časopis / Zdroj | Ecological Indicators |
| Fakulta / Pracoviště MU | |
| Citace | |
| www | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X15003362 |
| Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.011 |
| Obor | Znečištění a kontrola vody |
| Klíčová slova | Monitoring; Rehabilitation; Restoration measures; Review; River management; Water Framework Directive |
| Popis | An increasing number of rivers have been restored over the past decades and several studies investigated the effect on biota. The published monitoring results have already been summarized in narrative reviews but there are few quantitative reviews and a comprehensive meta-analysis on different organism groups and factors influencing restoration effect is missing. We compiled monitoring results and information on catchment, river and project characteristics from peer-reviewed literature and unpublished databases to (i) quantify the effect of restoration measures on fish, macroinvertebrates and macrophytes, and (ii) identify predictors which influence restoration effect. Results indicated significant effects of restoration on all three organism groups, especially of widening projects on macrophyte richness/diversity, instream measures on fish and macroinvertebrates, and higher effects on abundance/biomass compared to richness/diversity. Restoration effect was most strongly affected by agricultural land use, river width and project age. Effects were smaller but restoration generally still increased richness/diversity and abundance/biomass in agricultural catchments. Since land use is a proxy for different pressures, the underlying causal relationships have to be investigated in more detail. Project age was the most important factor but had non-linear and even negative effects on restoration outcome, indicating that restoration effects may vanish overtime. The meta-analysis indicated that river managers in general can expect an increase of richness/diversity and abundance/biomass of all three organism groups investigated, especially of macrophytes in widening projects and of fish and macroinvertebrates if instream measures are applied. However, variability was high, stressing the need for adaptive management approaches. |
| Související projekty: |