Evolution and Adaptations of Robotic DIEP Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Economics and Administration. It includes Faculty of Medicine. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.

Authors	MORKUZU Suat BAYEZID Kadir Can OZMEN Berk B EREN Seyma Fatima FARHAT Souha MCLENNAN Alexandra L JAMES Andrew J NIKKHAH Dariush AZOURY Said C DJOHAN Risal S BISHOP Sarah N SCHWARZ Graham S
Year of publication	2025
Type	Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source	JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
MU Faculty or unit	Faculty of Medicine
Citation
web	https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/abstract/2025/01000/evolution_and_adaptations_of_robotic_diep_flap.87.aspx
Doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010790
Keywords	Breast reconstruction; DIEP; microsurgery; RoboDIEP; robotic surgery; TAPP; TEP
Description	Background:The integration of robotic technology into surgical procedures has gained considerable attention for its promise to enhance a variety of clinical outcomes. Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest has emerged as a novel approach for autologous breast reconstruction. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current techniques, outcomes, and complications of robotic DIEP flap surgery.Methods:A systematic literature search was conducted after PRISMA 2020 guidelines across databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from 2000 to 2023. Articles exploring robotic DIEP flap harvest for breast reconstruction were assessed to compare operative techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. The risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Results:Fourteen studies involving 108 patients were included. Three studies used a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, whereas 11 studies used a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach. Preoperative planning utilized computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography imaging. The mean robotic operative time was 64 minutes, with total operative times averaging 574 minutes for TAPP and 497 minutes for TEP. The mean length of stay was 5 days, and the mean fascial incision length was 3 cm. Overall complication rate was 14.9%, with no significant difference compared with conventional DIEP flap procedures.Conclusion:Robotic DIEP flap harvest is a promising technique that may reduce postoperative pain and limiting abdominal donor site morbidity. Potential limitations include longer operative times, variable hospital stays, and increased costs.
Related projects:	Inovace v popáleninové medicíně a rekonstrukční plastické chirurgii