Zásada ne bis in idem v judikatuře evropského soudu pro lidská práva a v judikatuře nejvyššího správního soudu

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Economics and Administration. It includes Faculty of Law. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Title in English The ne bis in idem principle in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Administrative Court
Authors

POSPÍŠILÍKOVÁ Barbora

Year of publication 2023
Type Article in Proceedings
Conference COFOLA 2023 část 5 – Žaloba proti rozhodnutí správního orgánu
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Law

Citation
Web Open access sborníku
Keywords The Prohibition Against Double Jeopardy; Administrative Punishment; Concurrent Administrative Offences; Breach of Environmental Protection Obligations.
Description The article focuses on the ne bis in idem principle (or the principle of prohibition of double jeopardy) and the related issue of double jeopardy in environmental protection. The aim of the article is to establish how the European Court of Human Rights interprets the ne bis in idem principle and to outline the shift that has occurred in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in its approach to this principle. At the same time, the aim is to identify how this principle is interpreted in the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court, with a focus on the case law concerning administrative punishment in the field of environmental law. The case-law in question reflects situations in which, on the basis of an action against a decision of an administrative authority, the offender claims that he has been punished twice for one act, which should violate the principle of prohibition of double jeopardy.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.