Choice of Court Agreements after Brexit
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2019 |
| Type | Article in Proceedings |
| Conference | Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21st Century |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| Web | Open access sborníku |
| Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9497-2019 |
| Keywords | Diversity of Substantive Law; Matrimonial Property Regimes; Matrimonial Property Regulation; Overriding Mandatory Provisions; Public Policy Exception; Regional Unification of the Conflict-of-law Rules |
| Description | The aim of the contribution is to assess whether Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreement and Brussels Ibis Regulation are comparable legal instruments as far as choice of court agreements are concerned. The article shall analyze mutual features of the two legal instruments as well as their divergences in relation to choice of court agreements. The article shall demonstrate whether Hague Convention presents a complete and a comprehensive solution in terms of choice of court agreements for the UK provided that the Brussels Regulation is no longer applicable. |
| Related projects: |