Are We Exposed to Halogenated Flame Retardants from both Primary and Secondary Sources?

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Economics and Administration. It includes Faculty of Science. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

YANG Congqiao JÍLKOVÁ Simona Rozárka MELYMUK Lisa Emily HARRIS Shelley Anne JANTUNEN Liisa M. PERTILI Jessica WINN Louise DIAMOND Miriam L.

Year of publication 2020
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Environmental Science & Technology Letters
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
Web https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00268
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00268
Keywords Redox reactions; Atmospheric chemistry; Plastics; Mixtures; Ethers
Description Halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) were measured in air, floor dust, and surface wipes of electronic devices (e-devices) and hands of participants in 51 Canadian homes to assess the relationship between HFR levels in these matrices and to identify major sources and exposure pathways. Hand-held e-devices had significantly higher concentrations of all HFRs than non-hand-held devices, with the exceptions being decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE) and decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209). HFR concentrations on hands were correlated with levels in dust and hand-held e-devices, with the strongest correlations being seen for BDE-47 and -99, 2-ethylhexyl-2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoate (EH-TBB), and bis(3-ethylhexyl) tetrabromophthalate (BEH-TEBP). It is highly unlikely that hand-held devices sampled in 2015 had intentionally added BDE-47 and -99 that were regulated in 2008 in Canada. We hypothesize that hands transferred these chemicals from older products, which act as primary sources, to hand-held devices, which then can act as secondary sources of exposure. This study also found evidence for TVs as a primary source of DBDPE and BDE-209 for dust, hand-held devices, and hands. We suggest that an outdated, overly stringent flammability standard, developed in the 1970s to protect against fires from "instant-on" cathode ray tube TVs, led to elevated levels of these HFRs indoors. Although the standard for TV enclosures has been updated recently, the legacy of the outdated standard persists.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.