Current density as routine parameter for description of ionic membrane current: is it always the best option?

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Economics and Administration. It includes Faculty of Medicine. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

KULA Roman BÉBAROVÁ Markéta MATEJOVIČ Peter ŠIMURDA Jiří PÁSEK Michal

Year of publication 2020
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
Web https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610719301452?via%3Dihub
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.11.011
Keywords Ionic current; Current density; Current-capacitance correlation; Current-capacitance proportionality; Rat cardiomyocyte; Normalisation by ratio
Description The current density (J) is a parameter routinely used to characterize individual ionic membrane currents. Its evaluation is based on the presumption that the magnitude of whole-cell ionic membrane current (I) is directly proportional to the cell membrane capacitance (C), i.e. I positively and strongly correlates with C and the regression line describing I-C relation intersects the y-axis close to the origin of coordinates. We aimed to prove the presumption in several examples and find whether the conversion of I to J could be always beneficial. I-C relation was analysed in several potassium currents, measured in rat atrial myocytes (in inward rectifier currents, I-K1, and both the constitutively active and acetylcholine-induced components of acetylcholine-sensitive current, I-K(Ach)CONST and I-K(Ach)ACH), and in rat ventricular myocytes (transient outward current I-to). I-C correlation was estimated by the Pearson coefficient (r). A coefficient (k) was newly suggested describing deviation of the regression intercept from zero in currents with considerable r value. Based on mathematical simulations, I was satisfactorily proportional to C when r >= 0.6 and k <= 0.2 which was fulfilled in I-K1 and I-K(Ach)ACH (r = 0.84, k = 0.20, and r = 0.61, k = 0.06, respectively). IeC correlation was significantly positive, but weak in I-K(Ach)CONST (r = 0.42), and virtually missing in Ito (r = 0.04). The impaired I-C proportionality in I-K(Ach)CONST and Ito likely reflects heterogeneity of the channel expression. We conclude that the conversion of I to J should be avoided when I-C proportionality is absent. Otherwise, serious misinterpretation of data may arise. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.