Minimal-Counterintuitiveness Revisited: Effects of cultural and ontological violations on concept memorability

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Economics and Administration. It includes Faculty of Arts. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

PORUBANOVÁ Michaela SHAW Daniel Joel XYGALATAS Dimitrios

Year of publication 2014
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Arts

Citation
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.v1i2.181
Field Philosophy and religion
Keywords minimal-counterintuitiveness; cultural schema-level; domain-level; bizzarness; memorability
Attached files
Description Many religious ideas have attributes that violate our expectations about the state of the natural world. It has been argued that minimal counter-intuitiveness (MCI), defined as a mild violation of innate (ontological) expectations, makes such ideas memorable and prone to cultural transmission. Empirical studies have examined memory for concepts that violate innate ontological expectations; however memorability of ideas that defy cultural or learned expectations have been (with few exceptions) overlooked. In our study, we compared memory for ideas that violate intuitive ontologies, learned expectations, and everyday, intuitive ideas. We discuss the mnemonic advantage of minimally counterintuitive ideas in terms of a combination of associative strength and bizarreness.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.